Quick Cart
£0 (0 items)

ready-mades

13th Aug 2010 | Subscribe via RSS

I found this interesting quote today in a book I’m reading.  It’s from Marcel Duchamp, taken from a letter he wrote to Hans Richter:

‘This Neo- Dada, which they call New Realism, Pop Art, Assemblage etc., is an easy way out, and lives on what Dada did.  When I discovered ready-mades I thought to discourage aesthetics.  In Neo-Dada they have taken my ready-mades and found aesthetic beauty in them.  I threw the bottlerack and the urinal into their faces as a challenge and now they admire them for their aesthetic beauty’.

This somehow resonated with me, and made me think about the lighter series I’m currently working on.  I find beauty in mass produced objects.

However, although I like Pop Art, I don’t really feel much affinity with the aims of pop artists such as Andy Warhol, whose response to the mass produced object was to create mass produced art without trace of human craft.  Other artists such as Jasper Johns took a more painterly approach which is something I can identify with, although the resulting paintings are very different from my own.

My response to the ready-made is to create a unique, individual painting.  I see the exceptional in each object, and although I make use of repetition in the composition, there is also variation.  My attention to capturing the quality of the light also places the objects firmly back in the natural world, of which I feel man made objects are a part – because we ourselves come from nature. 

3 Responses

Soraya
30th Aug 2010

I think Duchamp could possibly be talking about the way in which we insist on finding aesthetic beauty and order in everything – it’s hard to see if he thinks this is a good thing, as if he’s changed his mind now “When I first discovered ready-mades…” or if he is disturbed by this ( “I threw the bottlerack and the urinal into their faces as a challenge..”) unstoppable transformation, and for him the avant garde becoming the orthodox. Would love to know a little more about the content of the letter. Thanks for sharing this.

I love your lighter paintings, I find them touching – these are always the lighters I buy when I can’t afford a clipper. They are such odd objects, because you never feel your own them, they get passed around and exchanged too much, and you can always doubt which colour is temporarily yours.

akuta
02nd Sep 2010

It is also hard to see if Duchamp was being disengenuous. The bottle rack is quite an interesting object, clearly not selected at random without any consideration of aesthetic qualities. Did he really no see its ‘beauty’?

Jemima
09th Sep 2010

That’s a really good question. And got me thinking about how maybe he was asking questions about the distinctions we make between the different things humans produce and in what contexts. why is one thing art and another thing product or object.

Leave a Reply